 |
 |
On 4 May 2010 13:19, Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> Having read the rest of this thread, I find that nothing that's been >> said changes my initial gut reaction on reading this question: DO NOT >> USE DCTERMS. It's vocabulary is Just Plain Inadequate, and not only >> for esoteric cases like the Alternative Chronological Designation of >> First Issue or Part of Sequence field that Karen mentioned. Despite >> having 70 (seventy!) elements, it's lacking fundamental fields for >> describing articles in journals -- there are no journalTitle, volume, >> issue, startPage or endPage fields. That, for me, is a deal-breaker. > > If you're using Dublin Core as XML, I agree with this. If you're > using Dublin Core as RDF (which is, honestly, the only thing it's > really good for), this is a non-issue. Oh, what is the solution when using it in RDF?