 |
 |
d'oh, s/dcterms:related/dcterms:relation/ (thanks ksclarke). I also meant to point out that rdfs:seeAlso is another option. //Ed On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Ed Summers <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Jonathan Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> So "dc:relation" does sound like the right vocabulary element for generic >> "related web page page", thanks. Is the value of dc:relation _neccesarily_ >> a URI/URL? I hope so, because otherwise I'm not sure dc:relation is >> sufficient, as I really do need something that says "some related URL". > > As Ross pointed out you probably should use dcterms:related if you > want to be more explicit about the range being a URI. If you happen to > want to serialize these links in Atom you could layer these > dcterms:related assertions pretty easily: > > <feed> > ... > <entry> > <id>https://blacklight.mse.jhu.edu/demo/catalog/bib_391129</id> > <title>The Journal of physiology</title> > <updated>2010-07-08T11:26:10Z</updated> > <link href="https://blacklight.mse.jhu.edu/demo/catalog/bib_391129" > rel="alternate" type="text/html"/> > <link href="http://jp.physoc.org/" > rel="http://purl.org/dcterms/related" type="text/html" /> > ... > <summary type="html">...</summary> > </entry> > </feed> > > //Ed >