I think the constraint is that it has to be a rational number. -----Original Message----- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Eric Hellman Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:58 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] mailing list administratativia I vote for changing the limit threshold to PI * (eventual length of this meta-thread). On Oct 27, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Alexander Johannesen wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Doran, Michael D <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> Can that limit threshold be raised? If so, are there reasons why it should not be raised? > > Is it to throttle spam or something? 50 seems rather low, and it's > rather depressing to have a lively discussion throttled like that. Not > to mention I thought I was simply kicked out for living things up > (especially given my reasonable follow-up was where the throttling > began). > > Alex > -- > Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic > Maps > --- http://shelter.nu/blog/ > ---------------------------------------------- > ------------------ http://www.google.com/profiles/alexander.johannesen > --- Eric Hellman President, Gluejar, Inc. 41 Watchung Plaza, #132 Montclair, NJ 07042 USA [log in to unmask] http://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/ @gluejar