 |
 |
> One way is to first transform the MARC into MARC-XML. Then you can use XSLT to crosswalk the MARC-XML > into that other schema. Very handy. > Your criticisms of MARC-XML all seem to presume that MARC-XML is the goal, the end point in the process. > But MARC-XML is really better seen as a utility, a middle step between binary MARC and the real goal, > which is some other "useful and interesting" XML schema. Unless "useful and interesting" is a euphemism for Dublin Core, then using XSLT for crosswalking is not really an option. Well, not a good option. On the other end of the spectrum, assume Onix for "useful and interesting" and XSLT simply won't work. Crosswalking doesn't hold water as a justification for MARCXML. /dev -- Devon Smith Consulting Software Engineer OCLC Research http://www.oclc.org/research/people/smith.htm -----Original Message----- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Walker, David Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:57 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MARCXML - What is it for? > b) expanding it to be actual useful and interesting. But here I think you've missed the very utility of MARC-XML. Let's say you have a binary MARC file (the kind that comes out of an ILS) and want to transform that into MODS, Dublin Core, or maybe some other XML schema. How would you do that? One way is to first transform the MARC into MARC-XML. Then you can use XSLT to crosswalk the MARC-XML into that other schema. Very handy. Your criticisms of MARC-XML all seem to presume that MARC-XML is the goal, the end point in the process. But MARC-XML is really better seen as a utility, a middle step between binary MARC and the real goal, which is some other "useful and interesting" XML schema. --Dave ================== David Walker Library Web Services Manager California State University http://xerxes.calstate.edu ________________________________________ From: Code for Libraries [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alexander Johannesen [[log in to unmask]] Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 12:38 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MARCXML - What is it for? Hiya, On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Nate Vack <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Switching to an XML format doesn't help with that at all. I'm willing to take it further and say that MARCXML was the worst thing the library world ever did. Some might argue it was a good first step, and that it was better with something rather than nothing, to which I respond ; Poppycock! MARCXML is nothing short of evil. Not only does it goes against every principal of good XML anywhere (don't rely on whitespace, structure over code, namespace conventions, identity management, document control, separation of entities and properties, and on and on), it breaks the ontological commitment that a better treatment of the MARC data could bring, deterring people from actually a) using the darn thing as anything but a bare minimal crutch, and b) expanding it to be actual useful and interesting. The quicker the library world can get rid of this monstrosity, the better, although I doubt that will ever happen; it will hang around like a foul stench for as long as there is MARC in the world. A long time. A long sad time. A few extra notes; http://shelterit.blogspot.com/2008/09/marcxml-beast-of-burden.html Can you tell I'm not a fan? :) Kind regards, Alex -- Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps --- http://shelter.nu/blog/ ---------------------------------------------- ------------------ http://www.google.com/profiles/alexander.johannesen ---