 |
 |
Hi Bess, +1 for Jasmine. Used to dig blue-ridge for these things, but I don't think they're maintaining that any more. Wayne On 1/27/11 9:37 AM, "John Loy" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Bess, > > Good to hear from you! I've been using Jasmine with its jQuery > extension<https://github.com/velesin/jasmine-jquery>for HTML fixtures > and DOM-related expect methods in > tandem with Google's > JsTestDriver<https://github.com/ibolmo/jasmine-jstd-adapter> . > For data fixtures, take a look as Jupiter's jQuery fixtures > plugin<http://jupiterjs.com/news/ajax-fixtures-plugin-for-jquery>. > Though you can run Jasmine in a continuous integration environment with its > Gem, which in turn uses Selenium RC and Firefox, JsTestDriver allows > simultaneous running of tests in multiple browsers. Headless testing doesn't > make a whole lot of sense to me. I'd rather know for certain that my code is > cross-browser. > > Hope you are well. > > Cheers, > John > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Bess Sadler <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Can anyone recommend a javascript testing framework? At Stanford, we know >> we need to test the js portions of our applications, but we haven't settled >> on a tool for that yet. I've heard good things about celerity ( >> http://celerity.rubyforge.org/) but I believe it only works with jruby, >> which has been a barrier to getting started with it so far. Anyone have >> other tools to suggest? Is anyone doing javascript testing in a way they >> like? Feel like sharing? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Bess >>