Print

Print


Couldn't agree with you more Shane...on all points.

Say "hey" to Jeremy York, Mike Creech, Ken Varnum, Suzanne Chapman or Molly
Kleinman if you see them milling about the Library. I did a ton of usability
work with them in my grad program.

The Library was just hunting to fill your position as I was exiting UM -
looks like they made a great pick!

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Beers, Shane <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I don't see why not. One thing that is true is that "standards", especially
> those designed to provide models (OAIS) and even more especially those
> designed to provide some sort of oversight/review (TRAC) are always being
> questioned in terms of their appropriateness, applicability, and intent. As
> an example, TRAC certainly has people questioning the way in which it's
> being implemented by CRL, the financial model driving it, and so on. While
> somewhat separate from the standard itself, it probably behooves us to look
> at external commentary on the way standards are being implemented. In fact,
> implementation examples are frequently much more helpful than simply knowing
> what the standard is, at least to me.
>
> Not sure exactly if this is what you were getting at, but throwing my 2
> cents in.
>
>
> Shane Beers
> Digital Preservation Librarian at the University of Michigan
> [log in to unmask]
> (734) 615-2686
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The NDSA Standards working group list [mailto:
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Matt Schultz
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 9:23 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [NDSA-STANDARDS] Preservation Models & Evaluation Metrics - Matt
> Schultz
>
> [snip]
>
> Question: There are several articles that have been published on the
> application of these models & metrics in various environments, might it be
> worthwhile to carve out a space to be able to identify some of these? This
> holds true for many of the other standards that are at various stages of
> development and acceptance within the community. Perhaps these would prove
> invaluable at our later stages of analysis and reporting? Thoughts?
>
> --
> Matt Schultz
> Collaborative Services Librarian
> Educopia Institute, MetaArchive Cooperative
> http://www.metaarchive.org
> [log in to unmask]
> 616-566-3204
>



-- 
Matt Schultz
Collaborative Services Librarian
Educopia Institute, MetaArchive Cooperative
http://www.metaarchive.org
[log in to unmask]
616-566-3204