 |
 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > Jonathan Rochkind > > [I agree that simply copying the Solr API for a standard like SRU is not > the way to go -- Solr is an application that supports various low-level > things that are not appropriate in that level of detail for a standard > like SRU or what have you, at least not until they've been shown to be > needed.] Sadly, the use case for me was a group of SOLR developers who wanted an SRU interface and claimed to want SOLR facets exposed. Now, if as I suspect, SOLR facets are overengineered and have features that have not been shown to be needed, then I've overengineered too. But I don't feel like I can impose an extreme programming attitude to their requirement and make them justify each SOLR feature. Ralph