 |
 |
Ralph, Owen's pointing to a list where corporate (110) and geographic names (151) are mixed. Thanks Owen, I haven't seen that the first time. I guess you got that mixed 110/151 when limiting to 'exact name'. Perhaps Andrew has a workaround. *Ya'aqov* On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:34 AM, LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > If you look at the fields those names come from, I think they mean > England as a corporation, not England as a place. > > Ralph > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf > Of > > Owen Stephens > > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:28 AM > > To: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] LCSH and Linked Data > > > > Still digesting Andrew's response (thanks Andrew), but > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Ya'aqov Ziso <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > > > > *Currently under id.loc.gov you will not find name authority > records, but > > > you can find them at viaf.org*. > > > *[YZ]* viaf.org does not include geographic names. I just checked > there > > > England. > > > > > > > Is this not the relevant VIAF entry > > http://viaf.org/viaf/14299580<http://viaf.org/viaf/142995804> > > > > > > -- > > Owen Stephens > > Owen Stephens Consulting > > Web: http://www.ostephens.com > > Email: [log in to unmask] > -- *ya'aqov**ZISO | **[log in to unmask] **| 856 217 3456 *