 |
 |
That's right. I see that Google didn't provide a -1 button on their +1 button experiment. Cindy Harper, Systems Librarian Colgate University Libraries [log in to unmask] 315-228-7363 On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Peter Noerr <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Just curious: - what do you mean by " Some way to avoid the site-scrapers > who populate the troubleshooting > > pages." (last sentence below)? > > I presume you are wishing to avoid the "trouble shooting" sites which > consist of nothing more than pages copied from other sites, and look only at > the prime source pages for information? > > Peter > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > Cindy Harper > > Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 2:15 PM > > To: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: [CODE4LIB] Group-sourced Google custom search site? > > > > That reminds me - I was looking last week into the possibility of making > a > > Google custom search site with either a whitelist of trusted technology > > sites, or a blacklist of sites to exclude. I haven't looked into whether > > the management of that could be group-sourced, but maybe someone else > here > > has thought about this. I haven't looked into the terms of service of > > custom search sites, either. But of course slashdot was high on the > > whitelist. I was thinking about sites for several purposes - general > > technology news and opinion, or specific troubleshooting / programming > > sites. Some way to avoid the site-scrapers who populate the > troubleshooting > > pages. > > > > > > Cindy Harper, Colgate U. >