 |
 |
> I think Roy's question was fair given the ambiguity of the words > used and had it truly meant to "develop" (as from the ground up) > it could have served as a good conversation starting point about > how to determine the need and merits of starting another major > project with what appeared to be very limited resources. > Especially when there are many tools readily available from other > sources/projects. > > But the clarification has been issued and the response that new > wording is likely to be used in subsequent communications. > > Let's accept that and move on. I concur. Let's accept that and move on. -- Eric Lease Morgan