 |
 |
That might have been the beginning of the idea, and I love the graphics in the article and on their site, but I'm looking for something based on bibliographies of printed works, not scholarly communication. Digital Humanities might be a good model now that i think of it On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Sheila M. Morrissey < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > Matt -- > Do you mean something like this? > > http://chronicle.com/article/Maps-of-Citations-Uncover-New/128938/?sid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en > > Sheila > > Sheila M. Morrissey > Senior Research Developer > ITHAKA > 100 Campus Drive > Suite 100 > Princeton NJ 08540 > 609-986-2221 > [log in to unmask] > > ITHAKA (www.ithaka.org) is a not-for-profit organization that helps the > academic community use digital technologies to preserve the scholarly > record and to advance research and teaching in sustainable ways. We > provide innovative services that benefit higher education, including Ithaka > S+R, JSTOR, and Portico. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > Matt Amory > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 9:41 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: [CODE4LIB] "Citation Analysis" - like projects for print resources > > Is anyone involved with, or does anyone know of any project to extract and > aggregate bibliography data from individual works to produce some kind of > "most-cited" authors list across a collection? Local/Network/Digital/OCLC > or historic? > > Sorry to be vague, but I'm trying to get my head around whether this is a > tired old idea or worth pursuing... > > > -- > Matt Amory > (917) 771-4157 > [log in to unmask] > <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/matt-amory/8/515/239> > -- Matt Amory (917) 771-4157 [log in to unmask] http://www.linkedin.com/pub/matt-amory/8/515/239