On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Bill Dueber <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I was a strong proponent of NDJ at one point, but I've grown less strident > and more weary since then. > > Brad Baxter has a good overview of some options[1]. I'm assuming it's a > given we'd all prefer to work with valid JSON files if the pain-point can > be brought down far enough. > > A couple years have passed since we first talked about this stuff, and the > state of JSON pull-parsers is better than it once was: For completeness, I've added 'ndj' support to my proof of concept: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MARC-Utils-MARC2MARC_in_JSON/ FWIW :-) Brad