 |
 |
"Richard Wallis" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Collection of triples? Yes, no baggage there ... :) Some of us are doing this completely without a single triplet, so I'm not sure it is accurate or even politically correct. *hehe* > A classic example of only being able to describe/understand the future in > the terms of your past experience. Yes, exactly. Although, having said that, I'm excited that the library world is finally taking the semantic challenge seriously. It's taken quite a number of years, but slowly there's a few drips and draps happening. Here's to hoping that there's a fluse somewhere about to open fully, and maybe the RDA vehicle have proper wheels? (Didn't the last time I checked, but that's admittedly a couple of years back. I hear they at least got new suspension?) Regards, Alex