 |
 |
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Richard Wallis <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > However, I think you are thinking in the right direction - I am > resigning myself to just using the word 'description'. Q: In your definition, can *descriptions *be put* * into 1:1 correspondence with records (where a record is a atomic asserted set of propositions about a resource)? Simon