With the way code4lib works, you realize you just committed yourself to writing them down, right? :) -Mike On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 15:51, Wilfred Drew <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > If it is that important, it should be written down! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Cormack > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:36 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Unwritten Rules, formerly Pandering for votes for code4lib sessions > > On 2 December 2011 09:33, Munson, Doris <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> As a relative newcomer to this list, I second the idea that any offenders be contacted off list with an explanation of any unwritten rules they unknowingly violate. I suggest this becomes one of c4l's unwritten rules. >> >> > I totally just unwrote that down > > Chris >