I disagree that the voting procedure is flawed. I voted 12 times, which seems downright generous. Dan -----Original Message----- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kevin S. Clarke Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 2:00 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Pandering for votes for code4lib sessions (humor) Great... now this song is stuck in my head. ;-) Nicely done, though... Kevin On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Doran, Michael D <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> I feel this whole situation has tainted things somewhat. :( > > This incident appears to have been blown out of proportion. > > So to lighten the mood a bit, I offer this doggerel inspired by the above comment and with apologies to Ed Cobb, et al.: > > Tainted Votes > > Sometimes I feel I've got to > Run away I've got to > Get away > From the stain you cause with all this pandering > The votes were cast > Now my session's last > We can make this right > If the splash page is up by tonight > > Once I ran to you (I ran) > Now I'll run from you > The tainted votes have riven > All the results diebold had scriven > Take my jeers and that's not nearly all > Oh...tainted votes > Tainted votes > > -- Michael