 |
 |
I suppose if the subject always starts with NEcode4lib Then it will be simple to filter for those not interested. ___________________________________________ Michael Friscia Manager, Digital Library & Programming Services Yale University Library (203) 432-1856 -----Original Message----- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Edward M. Corrado Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 10:59 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] NEcode4lib? ++ Agreed, no reason to move it to a separate list. Just make sure you have adequate subject lines so it doesn't get confusing and people can delete without reading if they want. Edward On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Jay Luker <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > +1. Keep it on the main list. > > --jay > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Kevin S. Clarke <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> But I think in the past people on this list have said they don't mind >> the additional traffic from people planning regional stuff. It's >> useful to keep it on the main list, too, because the other regions can >> learn from the chatter (what works, what doesn't, etc.) >> >> Kevin >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Ranti Junus <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> Google Group works for planning code4lib regional-related stuff. >>> >>> On Dec 18, 2011 10:31 AM, "Tito Sierra" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>> What's the best way of organizing a code4lib regional without clogging the >>>> list? Google group?