 |
 |
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 13:16, Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > This fits in well with something I was thinking about earlier. To me, > the best way to "solve" the problem is to simply have more > conferences. I, personally, would like to do with away with the > "regional" "brand" and just call everything by Code4Lib [Location] > (which is pretty much how we refer to any 'main' conference in the > past tense, anyway). This way, there is no 'main' event. There are > just events. > And I'd wager that our "national" events are largely attended by folks who live in the host's region. 'Course I could be wrong. I would support THATCampizing code4lib in such a way; in fact, we're moving CURATEcamp towards the same model. +1 -Mike