 |
 |
Actually, my sense from last year's meeting, with significant contingents from Europe and Japan, is that code4lib has become an international conference. On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Michael J. Giarlo <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 13:16, Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >> This fits in well with something I was thinking about earlier. To me, >> the best way to "solve" the problem is to simply have more >> conferences. I, personally, would like to do with away with the >> "regional" "brand" and just call everything by Code4Lib [Location] >> (which is pretty much how we refer to any 'main' conference in the >> past tense, anyway). This way, there is no 'main' event. There are >> just events. >> > > And I'd wager that our "national" events are largely attended by folks > who live in the host's region. 'Course I could be wrong. > > I would support THATCampizing code4lib in such a way; in fact, we're > moving CURATEcamp towards the same model. > > +1 > > -Mike -- Daniel Lovins Head of Knowledge Access, Design & Development Knowledge Access & Resource Management Services New York University, Division of Libraries 20 Cooper Square, 3rd floor New York, NY 10003-7112 [log in to unmask] 212-998-2489