 |
 |
I like the rickroll idea, myself. Why would we inflict cataloging hell on anyone besides yo_bj? Oh, wait... :P Wafted through cyberspace from my iPad On Dec 2, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Ranti Junus <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Great, here comes the Troublesome Cataloger.... > > > In need for some energizer drink, > ranti. > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Becky Yoose <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> I am offended and disappointed by the Rickrolling suggestion. We are a >> group of professionals and should act as such. Resorting to low brow >> internet memes only demeans the group, its members, and a profession as a >> whole. >> >> The submit button in the script should go to a page where the submitter has >> to correct a malformed XML file before submitting their ballot. For a >> greater challenge, we could have the voter manually translate raw MARC into >> MARCXML. >> >> Friday come and me wan' go home, >> Becky >> >> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Ranti Junus <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> On Dec 1, 2011 8:48 AM, "Ross Singer" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>> One thing I would be open to is to put a disclaimer splash page before >>>> any ballot (only to be seen the first time a person votes) briefly >>>> explaining how the ballot works and to mention that ballot stuffing is >>>> "unethical, undemocratic and tears at the fabric that is Code4Lib" or >>>> some such. I would welcome contributions to the wording. >>>> [...] >>> >>> +1 for the disclaimer splash screen. >>> >>> Also: >>> Create a script that detects pandering. When they click the submit button, >>> rickroll them. ;-) >>> >>> ranti. >>> > > > > -- > Bulk mail. Postage paid.