 |
 |
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On > Behalf Of Michael B. Klein <snip> > In any case, I'm interested to see how effective this current "call > for > support" is. Me too! Could someone with access to the voting data perhaps anonymously pull out how many voters have given points to only a single talk or two? If the problem is indeed real, perhaps simply stating on the page that you are expected to evaluate _all_ proposals, and not just vote up a single talk, would help the issue? It might turn away some of the "wrong voters". Requiring to give out at least, say, 10 points, could be perhaps be a way to enforce some participation? Best, Kåre