 |
 |
People are going to use the YUI rich text editor and the output is run through tidy, so that should ensure the well-formedness of the HTML. Right now we have a system where thousands of small XHTML fragments exist as text files in a filesystem (edited manually, practically), which are rendered through wiki software. The fragments have RDFa attributes so that an RDFa python script can interpret wiki pages as RDF on the fly. We need to redesign the system from the ground up, and I'd like to use RDF as the source object. Ethan On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Simon Spero <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Suppose I have RDF describing an object, and I would like some > > fairly free-form human generating description about the object (let's say > > within <dcterms:description>). Is it semantically acceptable to have > XHTML > > nested directly in this element or would this be considered uncouth for > LOD? > > > > Free-form human generating is considered uncouth except behind closed > doors, but XML literals are explictly provided for - see > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/#dfn-rdf-XMLLiteral > > Simon >