Building on Christie's comments below, I have often seen Science,
Technology & Medicine combined. The categories will always have some
challenges such as is a map also a science record and if created by a
government entity.....We can only work to define what we mean by these
categories and realize overlap will occur.
John Faundeen, Archivist
U.S. Geological Survey
Earth Resources Observation and Science Center
47914-252nd Street
Sioux Falls, SD 57198 USA
Tel: 605-594-6092/Fax: [log in to unmask]
https://profile.usgs.gov/faundeen
~Records Management - The systematic control of records throughout their
lifecycle...ARMA.~
From:
"Moffatt, Christie (NIH/NLM) [E]" <[log in to unmask]>
To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
01/20/2012 07:38 AM
Subject:
Re: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
Sent by:
The NDSA Content working group list
<[log in to unmask]>
Forming smaller groups along these lines sounds like a good plan to me,
too. I am interested in the Science category, and would be in favor of
broadening that topic to include Medicine.
In thinking about your question on the desired granularity of our "at
risk" nominations, it seems as though starting with the identification of
content at a broader level then working toward object level might make
sense. We would then benefit from having a deeper understanding of the
types of content that are at risk as well as specific collections or
groups of material.
Christie
Christie Moffatt
Digital Manuscripts Program
History of Medicine Division
National Library of Medicine
Building 38, Room 1E-21
8600 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, MD 20894
Phone: 301-496-9136
Fax: 301-402-7034
-----Original Message-----
From: Grotke, Abigail [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 2:19 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
In our email yesterday about our plan for 2012 (Text of the email is here,
in case you missed it:
http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Plan_for_2012
) , we talked about the formation of Content Teams. What do you all think
of these proposed groupings?
Government
Politics and Law
Maps and Geography
News, Media, and Journalism
Science
Mathematics and Technology
Social Sciences
World History and Cultures
American History
Arts and Culture
Religion and Philosophy
If you had to sign up for one (well, you will be asked to sign up for one
as a member of the Content Working Group) - do you see your organization's
content representated? Are these good groupings for us to have? Should we
have fewer groups, more? Others? What content do you care about
preserving?
Don't worry. I'll keep emailing the list until someone, anyone responds...
:)
Abbie
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Abbie Grotke | Web Archiving Team Lead | Office of Strategic Initiatives
National Digital Information and Infrastructure Preservation Program |
Library of Congress http://www.loc.gov/webarchiving/ |
http://www.digitalpreservation.gov<http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/>
202-707-2833 | [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> | @agrotke
############################
To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1
############################
To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1
############################
To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1
