In our email yesterday about our plan for 2012 (Text of the email is here, in case you missed it: http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Plan_for_2012 ) , we talked about the formation of Content Teams. What do you all think of these proposed groupings? Government Politics and Law Maps and Geography News, Media, and Journalism Science Mathematics and Technology Social Sciences World History and Cultures American History Arts and Culture Religion and Philosophy If you had to sign up for one (well, you will be asked to sign up for one as a member of the Content Working Group) - do you see your organization's content representated? Are these good groupings for us to have? Should we have fewer groups, more? Others? What content do you care about preserving? Don't worry. I'll keep emailing the list until someone, anyone responds... :) Abbie ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Abbie Grotke | Web Archiving Team Lead | Office of Strategic Initiatives National Digital Information and Infrastructure Preservation Program | Library of Congress http://www.loc.gov/webarchiving/ | http://www.digitalpreservation.gov<http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/> 202-707-2833 | [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> | @agrotke ############################ To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1