Print

Print


Hi Abbie,

I would be interested in joining the World 
History and Cultures group.
Thanks!

The best,

Deborah
SCOLA

On 1/23/2012 10:50 AM, Grotke, Abigail wrote:
> Thanks, Ben. I've made a few more edits to the groups based on emails from last week. Here's our current list and how many members have expressed interest so far:
>
>      1 Government - 5
>      2 Business and Economics (maybe?) - 1
>      3 Politics and Law - 0
>      4 Maps and Geography (or Geospatial?) - 4
>      5 News, Media, and Journalism - 1
>      6 Science [and Medicine, or Science, Technology and Medicine?] - 2
>      7 Mathematics and Technology - (should we combine with Science&  Medicine?) - 0
>      8 Social Sciences - 4
>      9 World History and Cultures - 0
>      10 American History -4
>      11 Arts&  Humanities (includes literature, culture) - 2
>      12 Religion and Philosophy - 0
>
> We could use some other members chiming in and signing up! Feel free to email me or sign up via the wiki!
>
> http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Content_teams
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The NDSA Content working group list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ben Fino-Radin
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 10:52 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
>
> I've added Rhizome to the Arts&  Culture section.
>
> Literature with Arts&  Culture seems to be the logical fit. Perhaps "Arts&  Humanities" is a more apt category.
>
> --
> Ben Fino-Radin
> Digital Conservator
> Rhizome at the New Museum
> 235 Bowery New York, NY 10002
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Wurl, Joel<[log in to unmask]>  wrote:
>
>> I would second (third?) that idea.  When we form our grant review panels
>> here, we typically cluster together applications dealing with the history
>> of science, technology, and medicine.  There's considerable diversity
>> within that configuration, but I think that, in general, the number of
>> groups/domains for this working group activity would best be kept at a
>> manageable number.  I did have a question on where "literature" might fit
>> -- arts&  culture, perhaps?
>> Joel
>>
>> Joel Wurl
>> Sr. Program Officer
>> Division of Preservation&  Access
>> National Endowment for the Humanities
>> 1100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
>> Washington, DC  20506
>> phone:  202-606-8252      fax:  202-606-8639
>>          email:  [log in to unmask]
>> Visit the NEH Website at www.neh.gov
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: The NDSA Content working group list [mailto:
>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John L Faundeen
>> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 9:00 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
>>
>> Building on Christie's comments below, I have often seen Science,
>> Technology&  Medicine combined.  The categories will always have some
>> challenges such as is a map also a science record and if created by a
>> government entity.....We can only work to define what we mean by these
>> categories and realize overlap will occur.
>>
>> John Faundeen, Archivist
>> U.S. Geological Survey
>> Earth Resources Observation and Science Center 47914-252nd Street Sioux
>> Falls, SD 57198 USA
>> Tel: 605-594-6092/Fax: [log in to unmask]
>>              https://profile.usgs.gov/faundeen ~Records Management - The
>> systematic control of records throughout their lifecycle...ARMA.~
>>
>>
>>
>> From:
>> "Moffatt, Christie (NIH/NLM) [E]"<[log in to unmask]>
>> To:
>> [log in to unmask]
>> Date:
>> 01/20/2012 07:38 AM
>> Subject:
>> Re: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
>> Sent by:
>> The NDSA Content working group list
>> <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>>
>>
>> Forming smaller groups along these lines sounds like a good plan to me,
>> too.  I am interested in the Science category, and would be in favor of
>> broadening that topic to include Medicine.
>>
>> In thinking about your question on the desired granularity of our "at
>> risk" nominations, it seems as though starting with the identification of
>> content at a broader level then working toward object level might make
>> sense.  We would then benefit from having a deeper understanding of the
>> types of content that are at risk as well as specific collections or
>> groups of material.
>>
>> Christie
>>
>>
>> Christie Moffatt
>> Digital Manuscripts Program
>> History of Medicine Division
>> National Library of Medicine
>> Building 38, Room 1E-21
>> 8600 Rockville Pike
>> Bethesda, MD 20894
>> Phone: 301-496-9136
>> Fax: 301-402-7034
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Grotke, Abigail [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 2:19 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
>>
>> In our email yesterday about our plan for 2012 (Text of the email is here,
>> in case you missed it:
>>
>> http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Plan_for_2012
>> ) , we talked about the formation of Content Teams. What do you all think
>> of these proposed groupings?
>>
>>
>> Government
>>
>> Politics and Law
>>
>> Maps and Geography
>>
>> News, Media, and Journalism
>>
>> Science
>>
>> Mathematics and Technology
>>
>> Social Sciences
>>
>> World History and Cultures
>>
>> American History
>>
>> Arts and Culture
>>
>> Religion and Philosophy
>>
>> If you had to sign up for one (well, you will be asked to sign up for one
>> as a member of the Content Working Group) - do you see your organization's
>> content representated? Are these good groupings for us to have? Should we
>> have fewer groups, more? Others? What content do you care about
>> preserving?
>>
>> Don't worry. I'll keep emailing the list until someone, anyone responds...
>> :)
>>
>> Abbie
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Abbie Grotke | Web Archiving Team Lead | Office of Strategic Initiatives
>> National Digital Information and Infrastructure Preservation Program |
>> Library of Congress http://www.loc.gov/webarchiving/ |
>> http://www.digitalpreservation.gov<http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/>
>> 202-707-2833 | [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>  | @agrotke
>>
>>
>> ############################
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
>> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>> or click the following link:
>>
>> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1
>>
>>
>> ############################
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
>> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>> or click the following link:
>>
>> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ############################
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
>> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>> or click the following link:
>>
>> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1
>>
>> ############################
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
>> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>> or click the following link:
>>
>> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1
>>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1
>
>
>

############################

To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1