Although we're trying to consolidate, I think there is strong argument
to create a Performing Arts section, since the content type --
audio/video -- is the central output for this category and is at extreme
risk. This brings to mind other media types, such as amateur film,
non-news radio, oral histories, etc that would be included in many of
the other subject categories, but have a much higher risk level. Should
there be a content group based on media format?
And finally, I agree that there should be a Business and Economics
group. This might encourage content creators in the private sector and
for instance, the Philharmonic is as much a "business" (with extensive
connections to the business and labor communities) as it is a performing
arts and music institution.
For now, I've signed up for the Arts and Culture group.
-------------------------------------
Barbara Haws
Archivist and Historian
New York Philharmonic Archives
-----Original Message-----
From: The NDSA Content working group list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Grotke,
Abigail
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 11:50 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
Thanks, Ben. I've made a few more edits to the groups based on emails
from last week. Here's our current list and how many members have
expressed interest so far:
1 Government - 5
2 Business and Economics (maybe?) - 1
3 Politics and Law - 0
4 Maps and Geography (or Geospatial?) - 4
5 News, Media, and Journalism - 1
6 Science [and Medicine, or Science, Technology and Medicine?] - 2
7 Mathematics and Technology - (should we combine with Science &
Medicine?) - 0
8 Social Sciences - 4
9 World History and Cultures - 0
10 American History -4
11 Arts & Humanities (includes literature, culture) - 2
12 Religion and Philosophy - 0
We could use some other members chiming in and signing up! Feel free to
email me or sign up via the wiki!
http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Content_
teams
-----Original Message-----
From: The NDSA Content working group list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ben
Fino-Radin
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 10:52 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
I've added Rhizome to the Arts & Culture section.
Literature with Arts & Culture seems to be the logical fit. Perhaps
"Arts & Humanities" is a more apt category.
--
Ben Fino-Radin
Digital Conservator
Rhizome at the New Museum
235 Bowery New York, NY 10002
[log in to unmask]
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Wurl, Joel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I would second (third?) that idea. When we form our grant review
> panels here, we typically cluster together applications dealing with
> the history of science, technology, and medicine. There's
> considerable diversity within that configuration, but I think that, in
> general, the number of groups/domains for this working group activity
> would best be kept at a manageable number. I did have a question on
> where "literature" might fit
> -- arts & culture, perhaps?
> Joel
>
> Joel Wurl
> Sr. Program Officer
> Division of Preservation & Access
> National Endowment for the Humanities
> 1100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
> Washington, DC 20506
> phone: 202-606-8252 fax: 202-606-8639
> email: [log in to unmask]
> Visit the NEH Website at www.neh.gov
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The NDSA Content working group list [mailto:
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John L
> Faundeen
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 9:00 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
>
> Building on Christie's comments below, I have often seen Science,
> Technology & Medicine combined. The categories will always have some
> challenges such as is a map also a science record and if created by a
> government entity.....We can only work to define what we mean by these
> categories and realize overlap will occur.
>
> John Faundeen, Archivist
> U.S. Geological Survey
> Earth Resources Observation and Science Center 47914-252nd Street
> Sioux Falls, SD 57198 USA
> Tel: 605-594-6092/Fax: [log in to unmask]
> https://profile.usgs.gov/faundeen ~Records Management -
> The systematic control of records throughout their lifecycle...ARMA.~
>
>
>
> From:
> "Moffatt, Christie (NIH/NLM) [E]" <[log in to unmask]>
> To:
> [log in to unmask]
> Date:
> 01/20/2012 07:38 AM
> Subject:
> Re: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
> Sent by:
> The NDSA Content working group list
> <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
> Forming smaller groups along these lines sounds like a good plan to
> me, too. I am interested in the Science category, and would be in
> favor of broadening that topic to include Medicine.
>
> In thinking about your question on the desired granularity of our "at
> risk" nominations, it seems as though starting with the identification
> of content at a broader level then working toward object level might
> make sense. We would then benefit from having a deeper understanding
> of the types of content that are at risk as well as specific
> collections or groups of material.
>
> Christie
>
>
> Christie Moffatt
> Digital Manuscripts Program
> History of Medicine Division
> National Library of Medicine
> Building 38, Room 1E-21
> 8600 Rockville Pike
> Bethesda, MD 20894
> Phone: 301-496-9136
> Fax: 301-402-7034
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grotke, Abigail [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 2:19 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
>
> In our email yesterday about our plan for 2012 (Text of the email is
> here, in case you missed it:
>
> http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Plan_f
> or_2012
> ) , we talked about the formation of Content Teams. What do you all
> think of these proposed groupings?
>
>
> Government
>
> Politics and Law
>
> Maps and Geography
>
> News, Media, and Journalism
>
> Science
>
> Mathematics and Technology
>
> Social Sciences
>
> World History and Cultures
>
> American History
>
> Arts and Culture
>
> Religion and Philosophy
>
> If you had to sign up for one (well, you will be asked to sign up for
> one as a member of the Content Working Group) - do you see your
> organization's content representated? Are these good groupings for us
> to have? Should we have fewer groups, more? Others? What content do
> you care about preserving?
>
> Don't worry. I'll keep emailing the list until someone, anyone
responds...
> :)
>
> Abbie
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Abbie Grotke | Web Archiving Team Lead | Office of Strategic
> Initiatives National Digital Information and Infrastructure
> Preservation Program | Library of Congress
> http://www.loc.gov/webarchiving/ |
> http://www.digitalpreservation.gov<http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/
> >
> 202-707-2833 | [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> | @agrotke
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
> write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
>
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA
> -CONTENT&A=1
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
> write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
>
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA
> -CONTENT&A=1
>
>
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
> write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
>
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA
> -CONTENT&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
> write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
>
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA
> -CONTENT&A=1
>
############################
To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to:
mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-C
ONTENT&A=1
############################
To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to:
mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-C
ONTENT&A=1
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
############################
To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1
