Print

Print


Please add my name to the "Government" group.  Thanks.

DAVID R. KEPLEY
Preservation Programs (RX)
Office of Research Services
tel: 301-837-1878
fax: 301-837-3232
Blackberry:  301-974-7419
email:  [log in to unmask]


>>> "Grotke, Abigail" <[log in to unmask]> 1/23/2012 11:50 AM >>>
Thanks, Ben. I've made a few more edits to the groups based on emails from last week. Here's our current list and how many members have expressed interest so far:

    1 Government - 5 
    2 Business and Economics (maybe?) - 1
    3 Politics and Law - 0
    4 Maps and Geography (or Geospatial?) - 4
    5 News, Media, and Journalism - 1
    6 Science [and Medicine, or Science, Technology and Medicine?] - 2
    7 Mathematics and Technology - (should we combine with Science & Medicine?) - 0
    8 Social Sciences - 4
    9 World History and Cultures - 0
    10 American History -4
    11 Arts & Humanities (includes literature, culture) - 2
    12 Religion and Philosophy - 0

We could use some other members chiming in and signing up! Feel free to email me or sign up via the wiki! 

http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Content_teams 


-----Original Message-----
From: The NDSA Content working group list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ben Fino-Radin
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 10:52 AM
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Re: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams

I've added Rhizome to the Arts & Culture section.

Literature with Arts & Culture seems to be the logical fit. Perhaps "Arts & Humanities" is a more apt category.

--
Ben Fino-Radin
Digital Conservator
Rhizome at the New Museum
235 Bowery New York, NY 10002
[log in to unmask] 


On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Wurl, Joel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I would second (third?) that idea.  When we form our grant review panels
> here, we typically cluster together applications dealing with the history
> of science, technology, and medicine.  There's considerable diversity
> within that configuration, but I think that, in general, the number of
> groups/domains for this working group activity would best be kept at a
> manageable number.  I did have a question on where "literature" might fit
> -- arts & culture, perhaps?
> Joel
>
> Joel Wurl
> Sr. Program Officer
> Division of Preservation & Access
> National Endowment for the Humanities
> 1100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
> Washington, DC  20506
> phone:  202-606-8252      fax:  202-606-8639
>         email:  [log in to unmask] 
> Visit the NEH Website at www.neh.gov 
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The NDSA Content working group list [mailto:
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John L Faundeen
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 9:00 AM
> To: [log in to unmask] 
> Subject: Re: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
>
> Building on Christie's comments below, I have often seen Science,
> Technology & Medicine combined.  The categories will always have some
> challenges such as is a map also a science record and if created by a
> government entity.....We can only work to define what we mean by these
> categories and realize overlap will occur.
>
> John Faundeen, Archivist
> U.S. Geological Survey
> Earth Resources Observation and Science Center 47914-252nd Street Sioux
> Falls, SD 57198 USA
> Tel: 605-594-6092/Fax: [log in to unmask] 
>             https://profile.usgs.gov/faundeen ~Records Management - The
> systematic control of records throughout their lifecycle...ARMA.~
>
>
>
> From:
> "Moffatt, Christie (NIH/NLM) [E]" <[log in to unmask]>
> To:
> [log in to unmask] 
> Date:
> 01/20/2012 07:38 AM
> Subject:
> Re: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
> Sent by:
> The NDSA Content working group list
> <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
> Forming smaller groups along these lines sounds like a good plan to me,
> too.  I am interested in the Science category, and would be in favor of
> broadening that topic to include Medicine.
>
> In thinking about your question on the desired granularity of our "at
> risk" nominations, it seems as though starting with the identification of
> content at a broader level then working toward object level might make
> sense.  We would then benefit from having a deeper understanding of the
> types of content that are at risk as well as specific collections or
> groups of material.
>
> Christie
>
>
> Christie Moffatt
> Digital Manuscripts Program
> History of Medicine Division
> National Library of Medicine
> Building 38, Room 1E-21
> 8600 Rockville Pike
> Bethesda, MD 20894
> Phone: 301-496-9136
> Fax: 301-402-7034
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grotke, Abigail [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 2:19 PM
> To: [log in to unmask] 
> Subject: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
>
> In our email yesterday about our plan for 2012 (Text of the email is here,
> in case you missed it:
>
> http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Plan_for_2012 
> ) , we talked about the formation of Content Teams. What do you all think
> of these proposed groupings?
>
>
> Government
>
> Politics and Law
>
> Maps and Geography
>
> News, Media, and Journalism
>
> Science
>
> Mathematics and Technology
>
> Social Sciences
>
> World History and Cultures
>
> American History
>
> Arts and Culture
>
> Religion and Philosophy
>
> If you had to sign up for one (well, you will be asked to sign up for one
> as a member of the Content Working Group) - do you see your organization's
> content representated? Are these good groupings for us to have? Should we
> have fewer groups, more? Others? What content do you care about
> preserving?
>
> Don't worry. I'll keep emailing the list until someone, anyone responds...
> :)
>
> Abbie
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Abbie Grotke | Web Archiving Team Lead | Office of Strategic Initiatives
> National Digital Information and Infrastructure Preservation Program |
> Library of Congress http://www.loc.gov/webarchiving/ |
> http://www.digitalpreservation.gov<http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/>
> 202-707-2833 | [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> | @agrotke
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] 
> or click the following link:
>
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1 
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] 
> or click the following link:
>
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1 
>
>
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] 
> or click the following link:
>
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1 
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] 
> or click the following link:
>
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1 
>

############################

To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] 
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1 

############################

To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] 
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1

############################

To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1