 |
 |
Hi all, I'm working on an RDF model for describing concepts. I have skos:Concept nested inside rdf:RDF. Most documents will have little more than labels and related links inside of skos:Concept. However, for a certain type of concept, we have XML documents with a more sophisticated ontology and structure for describing the concept. I could embed this metadata into the RDF or reference it as an rdf:resource. It doesn't matter much to me either way, but I'm unsure of the semantically correct way to create this model. Suppose I have: <rdf:RDF> <skos:Concept rdf:about="URI"> <skos:prefLabel xml:lang="en">Label</skos:prefLabel> <nuds:nuds>.....more sophistated model......</nuds:nuds> </skos:Concept> </rdf:RDF> Is it okay to have the more sophistated metadata model embedded in skos:Concept alongside labels and related links? Suppose I want to store the more sophisticated metadata separately and reference it? I'm not sure what property adequately addresses this relation, semantically. Recommendations? Thanks, Ethan