 |
 |
> It failed on a file containing all of LC Classification. I need to > figure out why. -- To reply to myself: Having looked at the "file" db pattern source [1], I see that the "file" maintainer introduced a typo into the matching pattern for correctly identifying Classification records. That's way it's failing for Class records. Over and out, Kevin [1] ftp://ftp.astron.com/pub/file/ On 05/23/2012 03:48 PM, Ford, Kevin wrote: >> Does it work for bulk files? > -- It passed on a file containing 215 MARC Bibs and on a file containing 2,574 MARC Auth records. Don't know if you consider these "bulk," but there is more than 1 record in each file (caveat: "file" stops after evaluating the first line, so of the 2,574 Auth records, the last 2,573 could be invalid). It failed on a file containing all of LC Classification. I need to figure out why. > >> Kevin, do you have examples of the output? > -- I received "MARC21 Bibliography" and "MARC21 Authority" respectively. In theory, if Leader 20-23 are not "4500" then "(non-conforming)" should be appended to the identification. If requested, the mimetype - application/marc - should also be outputted. > > Rgds, > > Kevin > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of >> Ross Singer >> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 3:29 PM >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] MARC Magic for file >> >> Wow, this is pretty cool. >> >> Kevin, do you have examples of the output? >> >> Does it work for bulk files? >> >> I mean, I could just try this on my Ubuntu machine, but it's all the >> way downstairs... >> >> -Ross. >> >> On May 23, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Ford, Kevin wrote: >> >>> I finally had occasion today (read: remembered) to see if the *nix >> "file" command would recognize a MARC record file. I haven't tested >> extensively, but it did identify the file as MARC21 Bibliographic >> record. It also correctly identified a MARC21 Authority Record. I'm >> running the most recent version of Ubuntu (12.04 - precise pangolin). >>> >>> I write because the inclusion of a "file" MARC21 specification rule >> in the magic.db stems from a Code4lib exchange that started in March >> 2011 [1] (it ends in April if you want to go crawling for the entire >> thread). >>> >>> Rgds, >>> >>> Kevin >>> >>> [1] >>> https://listserv.nd.edu/cgi- >> bin/wa?A2=ind1103&L=CODE4LIB&T=0&F=&S=&P=1 >>> 12728 >>> >>> -- >>> Kevin Ford >>> Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library of Congress >>> Washington, DC