 |
 |
Thanks, Stefano. The Europeana report seems to be quite comprehensive. It is funny that I've searched earlier for triple store comparisons with more explicit parameters 'rdf triple store comparison', and the Europeana report appeared in the third page of the search results. The 'triple' in the search seems to be the culprit -- a clear need for more semantics in the search engine ;) Cheers, Ravi On May 29, 2012, at 1:01 AM, Stefano Bargioni wrote: > Maybe a G search can help to find comparisons: > http://www.google.com/search?sugexp=chrome,mod=4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=4store+Virtuoso+Jena+SDB++Mulgara > The result includes your post... added 8 minutes ago. > Stefano > > On 29/mag/2012, at 09.12, Ravi Shankar wrote: > >> We (DLSS at Stanford Libraries) are planning to use a triple store for storing and retrieving annotations (in RDF) on digital objects. We are currently looking at open-source triple stores such as 4store, Virtuoso, Jena SDB and Mulgara. Are you currently using a triple store or contemplating on using one? How would you evaluate 'your' triple store along the lines of 1) ease of setup, 2) scalability, 3) query performance, 3) bulk load performance, 4) access api, 5) documentation and 6) community support? >> >> Highly appreciate your thoughts, ideas and suggestions. >> >> Thanks, >> Ravi Shankar >> > > > __________________________________________________ > Il tuo 5x1000 al Patronato di San Girolamo della Carita' e' un gesto semplice ma di grande valore. > Una tua firma aiutera' i sacerdoti ad essere piu' vicini alle esigenze di tutti noi. > Aiutaci a formare sacerdoti e seminaristi provenienti dai 5 continenti indicando nella dichiarazione dei redditi il codice fiscale 97023980580.