... IE 5?!?!?! On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Brig C McCoy <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi... > > This is from the last six weeks from one of my public-facing websites. > Definitely not going to drop MSIE support for the website at this rate: > > # #reqs #pages browser > 1 18137 827 MSIE > 8651 437 MSIE/8 > 7400 277 MSIE/9 > 1866 52 MSIE/7 > 193 42 MSIE/6 > 16 16 MSIE/5 > 11 3 MSIE/10 > 2 1809 441 Safari > 1128 299 Safari/533 > 202 58 Safari/534 > 214 54 Safari/7534 > 79 23 Safari/6533 > 41 4 Safari/530 > 13 3 Safari/531 > 3 906 260 Netscape (compatible) > 4 1287 182 Firefox > 442 114 Firefox/13 > 408 34 Firefox/12 > 139 11 Firefox/10 > 163 6 Firefox/3 > 28 6 Firefox/14 > 11 5 Firefox/9 > 6 2 Firefox/4 > 12 2 Firefox/6 > 4 1 Firefox/15 > 8 1 Firefox/7 > 5 1164 175 Chrome > 718 111 Chrome/19 > 409 61 Chrome/20 > 23 1 Chrome/9 > 4 1 Chrome/10 > 1 1 Chrome/5 > > ...brig > > > > On 7/12/2012 9:33 AM, Michael Schofield wrote: > >> Ever since Microsoft announced the new IE auto-update policy, the >> blogosphere is fussing. This is definitely important (and good) news, but >> sites-Smashing Magazine has three articles on it in the last few days-are >> really pushing the "drop IE support," and "its literally slowing the >> internet down." I'm down, but that attitude-especially for libraries-isn't >> really the right one to have. It is, IMHO, an old view. A smart design >> strategy with progressive enhancement can deliver content to . everyone - >> which should be the priority for non-prof / [local-]government web >> presences >> over flare. Right?-- >> > Brig C. McCoy [log in to unmask] > Network Services Coordinator > Kansas City, Kansas Public Library > 625 Minnesota Avenue > Kansas City, KS 66101 > tel 913-279-2349 > cel 816-885-2700 > fax 913-279-2271 >