LISTSERV 16.5 - CODE4LIB Archives

Karen,

Your output looks like it comes from the old 2007 RDFa 1.0 parser:

http://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/extract?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.worldcat.org%2Foclc%2F527725&format=pretty-xml&warnings=false&parser=lax&space-preserve=true

The new 2012 RDFa 1.1 parser does a better job:

http://www.w3.org/2012/pyRdfa/extract?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.worldcat.org%2Foclc%2F527725&format=xml&rdfagraph=output&vocab_expansion=false&rdfa_lite=false&embedded_rdf=true&space_preserve=true&vocab_cache=true&vocab_cache_report=false&vocab_cache_refresh=false

Note the comment on the old interface page: http://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/

	Users are advised to migrate to RDFa 1.1 in general, including the RDFa 1.1 distiller.

RDFa 1.1 is still pretty new and getting more tools to support it will help.

Jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Karen Coyle
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 6:16 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Worldcat schema.org & search API
> 
> Ross, it might not be yahoo, but that doesn't mean I know what it is.
> The pyRDFa utility returns garbage for RDF/XML and TTL, but not for
> JSON. It's only in the JSON output that I am getting any bibliographic
> data. The other two send me back a bunch of links to css files. I guess
> this is good news for folks who prefer JSON. Also, I see the OCLC
> number
> in the JSON, but not the URI, although the URI appears in the div with
> the RDFa:
> 
> <div itemid="http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/527725" itemscope=""
> itemtype="http://schema.org/Book"
> resource="http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/527725"
> typeof="http://schema.org/Book"><<a
> href="http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/527725">http://www.worldcat.org/oclc
> /527725</a>>
> 
> I must say I wonder a bit about those double "<<>>" but what do I know?
> Anywhere, here's what I get from pyRDFa:
> 
> RDF/XML:
> 
> <rdf:RDF><_4:Book rdf:about="http://schema.org/Book"/><rdf:Description
> rdf:about="http://www.worldcat.org/title/selection-of-early-
> statistical-papers-of-j-neyman/oclc/527725"><xhv:stylesheet
> rdf:resource="http://static1.worldcat.org/wcpa/rel20120711/css/loginpop
> up.css"/><xhv:stylesheet
> rdf:resource="http://static1.worldcat.org/wcpa/rel20120711/html/masthea
> d.css"/><xhv:stylesheet
> rdf:resource="http://static1.worldcat.org/wcpa/rel20120711/css/alerts.c
> ss"/><xhv:stylesheet
> rdf:resource="http://static1.worldcat.org/wcpa/rel20120711/css/modals_j
> query.css"/><xhv:stylesheet
> rdf:resource="http://static1.worldcat.org/wcpa/rel20120711/html/layered
> _divs.css"/><xhv:stylesheet
> rdf:resource="http://static1.worldcat.org/wcpa/cssj/N245213502/bundles/
> print-min.css"/><xhv:stylesheet
> rdf:resource="http://static1.worldcat.org/wcpa/rel20120711/css/cr_print
> .css"/><xhv:stylesheet
> rdf:resource="http://static.weread.com/css/booksiread/relbookswidget.cs
> s?0:5"/><xhv:stylesheet
> rdf:resource="http://static1.worldcat.org/wcpa/rel20120711/css/itemform
> at.css"/><xhv:stylesheet
> rdf:resource="http://static1.worldcat.org/wcpa/cssj/N1807112156/bundles
> /screen-min.css"/><xhv:stylesheet
> rdf:resource="http://static1.worldcat.org/wcpa/rel20120711/html/record.
> css"/><xhv:stylesheet
> rdf:resource="http://static1.worldcat.org/wcpa/rel20120711/html/yui/bui
> ld/reset-fonts-grids/reset-fonts-grids.css"/><xhv:stylesheet
> rdf:resource="http://static1.worldcat.org/wcpa/rel20120711/html/new_wco
> rg.css"/></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
> 
> JSON:
> 
> {
> "@context": {
> "library": "http://purl.org/library/",
> "oclc": "http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/",
> "skos": "http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#",
> "madsrdf": "http://www.loc.gov/mads/rdf/v1#",
> "schema": "http://schema.org/",
> "http://purl.org/library/placeOfPublication": {
> "@type": "@id"
> },
> "http://schema.org/about": {
> "@type": "@id"
> },
> "http://schema.org/publisher": {
> "@type": "@id"
> },
> "http://schema.org/author": {
> "@type": "@id"
> },
> "http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#inScheme": {
> "@type": "@id"
> },
> "http://www.loc.gov/mads/rdf/v1#isIdentifiedByAuthority": {
> "@type": "@id"
> }
> },
> "@id": "oclc:527725",
> "@type": "schema:Book",
> "schema:inLanguage": {
> "@value": "en",
> "@language": "en"
> },
> "library:holdingsCount": {
> "@value": "285",
> "@language": "en"
> },
> "schema:author": {
> "@id": "http://viaf.org/viaf/24666861",
> "@type": "schema:Person",
> "madsrdf:isIdentifiedByAuthority":
> "http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n50066374",
> "schema:name": {
> "@value": "Neyman, Jerzy, 1894-1981.",
> "@language": "en"
> }
> },
> "schema:name": {
> "@value": "A selection of early statistical papers of J. Neyman.",
> "@language": "en"
> },
> "schema:datePublished": {
> "@value": "1967.",
> "@language": "en"
> },
> "schema:numberOfPages": {
> "@value": "429",
> "@language": "en"
> },
> "library:oclcnum": {
> "@value": "527725",
> "@language": "en"
> },
> "schema:about": [
> {
> "@type": "skos:Concept",
> "madsrdf:isIdentifiedByAuthority":
> "http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85082133",
> "schema:name": {
> "@value": "Mathematical statistics.",
> "@language": "en"
> }
> },
> {
> "@id": "http://dewey.info/class/519/",
> "@type": "skos:Concept",
> "skos:inScheme": "http://dewey.info/scheme/"
> },
> {
> "@type": "skos:Concept",
> "schema:name": {
> "@value": "Statistique mathématique.",
> "@language": "en"
> }
> },
> {
> "@id": "http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1012127",
> "@type": "skos:Concept",
> "schema:name": {
> "@value": "Mathematical statistics‍",
> "@language": "en"
> }
> }
> ],
> "schema:publisher": {
> "@type": "schema:Organization",
> "schema:name": {
> "@value": "University of California Press",
> "@language": "en"
> }
> },
> "library:placeOfPublication": {
> "@type": "schema:Place",
> "schema:name": {
> "@value": "Berkeley,",
> "@language": "en"
> }
> }
> }
> 
> kc
> 
> On 7/12/12 2:13 PM, Ross Singer wrote:
> > Ok, the Pipe didn't quite work as planned.  Yahoo! is stripping out
> > all of the relevant html attributes when it's converting the WC
> > microdata html to a string, which renders the whole thing useless.
> >
> > If I don't convert it to a string, it maintains all of the necessary
> > attributes in the JSON output, but it strips them from the RSS and
> > html outputs.
> >
> > I mean, it's hard to complain about "free thing doesn't handle my
> > niche problem", but when has that ever stopped me?
> >
> > Anyway, it's there for somebody to clone and poke around with.  Maybe
> > somebody more familiar with Pipes can figure a way around this
> > problem.
> >
> > -Ross.
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >> I made a Yahoo Pipe that merges the WorldCat Basic OpenSearch RSS
> >> result with the microdata div in the Worldcat pages referred to in
> the
> >> search results:
> >>
> >>
> http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.info?_id=05ae2a7bc180f3abe36b11bcaf1a
> dc52
> >>
> >> You'll need to enter your wskey for it to work.
> >>
> >> You can get the output as RSS (which will require the
> item/description
> >> to be unescaped to use) or JSON (which wouldn't require unescaping).
> >>
> >> It's not terribly fast, but it least should help somebody get
> started.
> >>
> >> -Ross.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >>> It isn't unfortunate, it was deliberate. I have a key for the basic
> api, but
> >>> I was being advised that I had overlooked the obvious answer of the
> worldcat
> >>> search API. I have no confusion between the two, except for the
> confusion
> >>> that seems to be promulgated by OCLC itself.
> >>>
> >>> kc
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 7/12/12 9:46 AM, Karen Coombs wrote:
> >>>> Karen,
> >>>>
> >>>> Unfortunately it looks like you requested a key for the WorldCat
> >>>> Search API which does have specific eligibility criteria. The
> WorldCat
> >>>> Basic API which Ross mentions is available to anyone -
> >>>> http://www.oclc.org/developer/services/worldcat-basic-api
> >>>>
> >>>> It allows you to do an OpenSearch keyword query of WorldCat and
> get
> >>>> back basic metadata including the link to the worldcat.org page
> for
> >>>> each record returned.
> >>>>
> >>>> The easiest way to get a key is to go to
> http://worldcat.org/config/
> >>>> and login with a WorldCat username/password. You should see a link
> >>>> that says WorldCat Basic API Key which you can use to get a key.
> >>>>
> >>>> I apologize for the confusion between the two APIs (WorldCat
> Search
> >>>> and WorldCat Basic). The difference is something we've tried to
> make
> >>>> clearer in our documentation but unfortunately given your
> experience
> >>>> it is still an issue.
> >>>>
> >>>> Karen
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >>>>> On 7/10/12 5:07 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> >>>>>> On 7/10/12 4:02 PM, Richard Wallis wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> But is it available to everyone, and is the data retrieved also
> usable
> >>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>> ODC-BY by any member of the Web public?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yes it is, and at this stage it is only available from within a
> html
> >>>>>>> page.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The "it" I was referring to was the API. Roy is telling me that
> people
> >>>>>> should use the API, as if that is an obvious option that I am
> >>>>>> overlooking. I
> >>>>>> am asking if the general web public can use the API to get this
> data. I
> >>>>>> believe that should be a yes/no question/answer.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Since no one here from OCLC had the integrity to answer this
> question, I
> >>>>> went ahead and applied for a Worldcat API key, and here is the
> reply:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *****
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you for your interest in the WorldCat Search API, however
> at this
> >>>>> time
> >>>>> the web service is only available to institutions, primarily
> libraries,
> >>>>> that
> >>>>> have a specific relationship with OCLC and then only for work
> related to
> >>>>> that library's services. The specific relationship is explained
> further
> >>>>> here,
> >>>>> http://oclc.org/developer/documentation/worldcat-search-api/who-
> can-use.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> However, there are other OCLC services that are available to
> individual's
> >>>>> non-commercial use.  Looking at the list of services available on
> >>>>> http://www.worldcat.org/wcpa/content/affiliate/ you'll see that
> the
> >>>>> WorldCat
> >>>>> search box and WorldCat links with embedded searches are
> available to
> >>>>> anyone.   You may also be interested in checking out the WorldCat
> >>>>> Registry,
> >>>>> or low-volume use of the xISBN and xISSN services.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you have questions about the service, please contact the
> product
> >>>>> manager,
> >>>>> Dawn Hendricks at [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *****
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There is nothing wrong with having a proprietary API; but
> pretending that
> >>>>> it
> >>>>> isn't (either directly or through omission), or being afraid to
> say it,
> >>>>> is
> >>>>> the kind of thing that has caused me to lose respect for OCLC.
> Nothing
> >>>>> should be declared "open" that isn't available to all, not just
> members.
> >>>>> And
> >>>>> advertisements for WC API classes should state "members only."
> That would
> >>>>> be
> >>>>> honest. And telling folks on a wide-open list that they should
> use the
> >>>>> Worldcat API (without mentioning "if you are in a member
> institution and
> >>>>> using this for library services) is at best deceiving, at worst
> >>>>> dishonest.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I, for one, am tired of OCLC's lies, and I'm not afraid to say
> it.
> >>>>> Fortunately for me, retirement is looming and I don't need to
> care who
> >>>>> likes
> >>>>> what I say. This is a relief, to say the least.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> kc
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> kc
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This experiment is the first step in a process to make linked
> data
> >>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>> WorldCat resources available.  As it will evolve over time
> other areas
> >>>>>>> such
> >>>>>>> as API access, content-negotiation, search & other query
> methods,
> >>>>>>> additional RDF data vocabularies, etc., etc., will be
> considered in
> >>>>>>> concert
> >>>>>>> with community feedback (such as this thread) as to the way
> forward.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Karen I know you are eager to work with and demonstrate the
> benefits of
> >>>>>>> this way of publishing data.  But these things take time and
> effort, so
> >>>>>>> please be a little patient, and keep firing off these use cases
> and
> >>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>> they are all valuable input.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ~Richard.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> kc
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>     Roy
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Kevin Ford
> <[log in to unmask]>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The use case clarifies perfectly.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Totally feasible.  Well, I should say "totally feasible"
> with the
> >>>>>>>>>> caveat
> >>>>>>>>>> that I've never used the Worldcat Search API.  Not letting
> that stop
> >>>>>>>>>> me,
> >>>>>>>>>> so
> >>>>>>>>>> long as it is what I imagine it is, then a developer should
> be able
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> perform a search, retrieve the response, and, by integrating
> one of
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> tools advertised on the schema.org website into his/her
> code, then
> >>>>>>>>>> retrieve
> >>>>>>>>>> the microdata for each resource returned from the search
> (and save
> >>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>> RDF
> >>>>>>>>>> or whatever).
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> If someone has created something like this, do speak up.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Yours,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Kevin
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 07/10/2012 04:48 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Kevin, if you misunderstand then I undoubtedly haven't been
> clear
> >>>>>>>>>>> (let's
> >>>>>>>>>>> at least share the confusion :-)). Here's the use case:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> PersonA wants to create a comprehensive bibliography of
> works by
> >>>>>>>>>>> AuthorB. The goal is to do a search on AuthorB in WorldCat
> and
> >>>>>>>>>>> extract
> >>>>>>>>>>> the RDFa data from those pages in order to populate the
> >>>>>>>>>>> bibliography.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Apart from all of the issues of getting a perfect match on
> authors
> >>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>> of manifestation duplicates (there would need to be editing
> of the
> >>>>>>>>>>> results after retrieval at the user's end), how feasible is
> this?
> >>>>>>>>>>> Assume
> >>>>>>>>>>> that the author is prolific enough that one wouldn't want
> to look
> >>>>>>>>>>> up
> >>>>>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>> of the records by hand.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> kc
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/10/12 1:43 PM, Kevin Ford wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> As for someone who might want to do this programmatically,
> he/she
> >>>>>>>>>>>> should take a look at the "Programming languages" section
> of the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> second link I sent along:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> http://schema.rdfs.org/tools.**html<http://schema.rdfs.org/tools.html>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> There one can find Ruby, Python, and Java extractors and
> parsers
> >>>>>>>>>>>> capable of outputting RDF.  A developer can take one of
> these and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> programmatically get at the data.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Apologies if I am misunderstanding your intent.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yours,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Kevin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 07/10/2012 04:34 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Kevin! And Richard!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm thinking we need a good web site with links to tools.
> I had
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> already
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> been introduced to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2012/pyRdfa/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> where you can past a URI and get ttl or rdf/xml. These
> are all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> good
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> resources. But what about someone who wants to do this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> programmatically,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> not through a web site? Richard's message indicates that
> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> yet
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> available, so perhaps we should be gathering use cases to
> support
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> need? And have a place to post various solutions, even
> ones that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OCLC-specific? (Because I am hoping that the use of
> microformats
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> increase in general.)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> kc
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/10/12 12:12 PM, Kevin Ford wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there an open search to get one to the desired
> records in the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> first
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- I'm not certain this will fully address your
> question, but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> try
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> these two sites:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Website:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> http://www.google.com/**webmasters/tools/richsnippets<http://www.google
> .com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Example: http://tinyurl.com/dx3h5bg
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Website:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://linter.structured-
> data.**org/<http://linter.structured-data.org/>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Example: http://tinyurl.com/bmm8bbc
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> These sites will extract the data, but I don't think you
> get
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> choice of serialization.  The data are extracted and
> displayed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> resulting page in the HTML, but at least you can *see*
> the data.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Additionally, there are a number of "tools" to help with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> microdata
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> extraction here:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> http://schema.rdfs.org/tools.**html<http://schema.rdfs.org/tools.html>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some of these will allow you to output specific (RDF)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> serializations.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kevin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 07/10/2012 02:42 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have demonstrated the schema.org/RDFa microdata in
> the WC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> database to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> various folks and the question always is: how do I get
> access
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (The only source I have is the Facebook API, me being a
> "user"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rather
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than a "maker".) The microdata is CC-BY once you get a
> Worldcat
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> URI, but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there an open search to get one to the desired
> records in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place? I'm poorly-versed in WC APIs so I'm hoping
> others have a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grasp.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rjw: the OCLC website does a thorough job of hiding
> email
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addresses or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would have asked this directly. Then again, a
> discussion here
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have added value.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kc
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Karen Coyle
> >>>>>>>> [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
> >>>>>>>> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> >>>>>>>> m: 1-510-435-8234
> >>>>>>>> skype: kcoylenet
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Karen Coyle
> >>>>> [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
> >>>>> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> >>>>> m: 1-510-435-8234
> >>>>> skype: kcoylenet
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Karen Coyle
> >>> [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
> >>> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> >>> m: 1-510-435-8234
> >>> skype: kcoylenet
> 
> --
> Karen Coyle
> [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet