As an administrator of a Confluence installation, I have to say that I hate it. Confluence is fine if you are not going to be touching it or doing any kind of local customizations (hooking it into local auth, etc.). If that's the case, you should really be looking at the hosted version. I've found that Atlassian is frustrating to deal with for support. I ran into a bug in Confluence that has been an open ticket in their issue tracker for 6 years. Years. I've found upgrades to be a pain, generally, and sometimes Atlassian will be fast and furious with them and it's hard to keep up. And the longer you wait, the more painful the upgrades become. I don't deal with the money side of things, but I definitely think that we do not get what we pay for with Confluence. -Sean On 7/25/12 9:05 AM, "Nathan Tallman" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > That's what I'm worried about with MediaWiki. The syntax used when creating > and editing pages isn't intuitive and I'm afraid people won't want to use > it. I was hoping someone would recommend a wiki with more of a WYSIWYG type > of editing interface. Was also hoping to stick with FLOSS, but perhaps I > should at least peak at Confluence. > > Thanks for the input, > Nathan > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Nate Vack <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> If you're expecting "everyone" to create and edit pages, >> it will be very hard to get widespread adoption with it. >>