 |
 |
I'd buy that shirt. On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Doran, Michael D <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> Second the motion to stop beating this dead horse. > > > > Dang, and I was already working on this 2013 conference t-shirt design... > > > > [cid:[log in to unmask]] > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > >> Friscia, Michael > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 7:46 AM > >> To: [log in to unmask] > >> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings! > >> > >> Second the motion to stop beating this dead horse. > >> > >> ___________________________________________ > >> Michael Friscia > >> Manager, Digital Library & Programming Services > >> > >> Yale University Library > >> (203) 432-1856 > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]]<mailto:[mailto:[log in to unmask]]> On Behalf Of > >> Carol Bean > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 8:43 AM > >> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> > >> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings! > >> > >> No. > >> > >> Just no. Vote taken. Preferences noted. Done. > >> > >> Carol > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:50 AM, Graham Triggs <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > On 6 August 2012 13:19, Ed Summers <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: > >> >> 150 people responded about whether jobs.code4lib.org posting should > >> >> come to the discussion list: > >> >> > >> >> yes: 132 > >> >> no: 10 > >> >> who cares: 8 > >> >> > >> >> 93% in support or agnostic seems to be a good indicator that the > >> >> postings should continue to come to the list for now. > >> > > >> > I'm not entirely convinced about that assessment. I quite readily > >> > agree that the jobs should be posted to *a* mailing list, I'm not so > >> > sure that it should be this mailing list. > >> > > >> > It's been discussed about filtering the jobs sent to the list, but I > >> > already filter the code4lib mailing list into a tag. It's been a bit > >> > of a faff, but I've subdivided the filtering so that I can get the > >> > messages sent from jobs@... to go to a different tag. But then Ed > >> > replied to one, so now it appears in both tags, and because I'm using > >> > Gmail, it takes the whole thread with it. > >> > > >> > So filtering really isn't a solution. > >> > > >> > Rather than just asking whether jobs should come to this mailing list, > >> > maybe we can ask whether a separate mailing list should be set up, > >> > specifically for jobs. The two mailing lists could be cross promoted > >> > (e.g. a standard footer), and people can choose whether they want or > >> > don't want to receive them. And we can still have > >> > discussions/follow-ups about those jobs on that mailing list. > >> > > >> > Even though the vast majority of the postings aren't applicable to me, > >> > I would probably still sign up to a separate jobs mailing list as it > >> > is of interest - but I would at least then be able to keep that > >> > separate from the main discussions, which is something I can't > >> > effectively do right now. > >> > > >> > G