Print

Print


I like the design, did you get the job to create it from a post to this list?

Ok I'll stop.

___________________________________________
Michael Friscia
Manager, Digital Library & Programming Services 

Yale University Library
(203) 432-1856


-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Doran, Michael D
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 9:17 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!

> Second the motion to stop beating this dead horse.



Dang, and I was already working on this 2013 conference t-shirt design...



[cid:[log in to unmask]]



> -----Original Message-----

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of

> Friscia, Michael

> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 7:46 AM

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!

>

> Second the motion to stop beating this dead horse.

>

> ___________________________________________

> Michael Friscia

> Manager, Digital Library & Programming Services

>

> Yale University Library

> (203) 432-1856

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]]<mailto:[mailto:[log in to unmask]]> On Behalf Of

> Carol Bean

> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 8:43 AM

> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!

>

> No.

>

> Just no. Vote taken. Preferences noted. Done.

>

> Carol

>

> Sent from my iPhone

>

> On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:50 AM, Graham Triggs <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>

> wrote:

>

> > On 6 August 2012 13:19, Ed Summers <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

> >> 150 people responded about whether jobs.code4lib.org posting should

> >> come to the discussion list:

> >>

> >>    yes: 132

> >>    no: 10

> >>    who cares: 8

> >>

> >> 93% in support or agnostic seems to be a good indicator that the

> >> postings should continue to come to the list for now.

> >

> > I'm not entirely convinced about that assessment. I quite readily

> > agree that the jobs should be posted to *a* mailing list, I'm not so

> > sure that it should be this mailing list.

> >

> > It's been discussed about filtering the jobs sent to the list, but I

> > already filter the code4lib mailing list into a tag. It's been a bit

> > of a faff, but I've subdivided the filtering so that I can get the

> > messages sent from jobs@... to go to a different tag. But then Ed

> > replied to one, so now it appears in both tags, and because I'm using

> > Gmail, it takes the whole thread with it.

> >

> > So filtering really isn't a solution.

> >

> > Rather than just asking whether jobs should come to this mailing list,

> > maybe we can ask whether a separate mailing list should be set up,

> > specifically for jobs. The two mailing lists could be cross promoted

> > (e.g. a standard footer), and people can choose whether they want or

> > don't want to receive them. And we can still have

> > discussions/follow-ups about those jobs on that mailing list.

> >

> > Even though the vast majority of the postings aren't applicable to me,

> > I would probably still sign up to a separate jobs mailing list as it

> > is of interest - but I would at least then be able to keep that

> > separate from the main discussions, which is something I can't

> > effectively do right now.

> >

> > G