 |
 |
Hi, I'd be interesting in adding a couple questions 1. the potential or roadmap for adding collaboration or public access to the archive. - I believe Archivematica is currently a prescribed approach to creating a closed digital archive (i.e provides preservation but without access (and submission of content) to any but archives staff) - if they are planning any front end access, then I have tons of additional questions (but I will save them) 2. I'd like to learn more about the ingest of different types of content (and any ability to customize this ingest) - possibly this ties into the workflow question? Gail Gail Truman Truman Technologies, LLC www.trumantechnologies.com facebook/TrumanTechnologies 510 502 6497 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [NDSA-INFRASTRUCTURE] FW: NDSA: Qs for Archivematica From: "Owens, Trevor" <[log in to unmask]> Date: Tue, October 09, 2012 12:16 pm To: [log in to unmask] Shawn Nicholson was having trouble posting his questions for our upcoming talk and discussion with Peter Van Garden Archivmatica and it's approach to open source software for digital preservation. So I offered to pass it on to the list. Here are his questions, What questions would you add? or refinements to these would you suggest? ".Will version 1.0 be another feature release, or will it signify a beta commitment? What does your answer mean for developers building tools to work with Archivematica? . What are 2 or 3 things that need to happen to broaden interoperability with major preservation softwares (e.g. FedoraCommons, ContentDM, Digital Commons)? .What can you say about the rumored "workflow customization gui"? Are there implications for institution-specific workflows and policies? .What performance tests does the Archivematica team run? Can you share anything about the specific metrics or performance goals?" (Reminder on call information) Call-in number: 866-469-3239 Participant access code: 21408589 10/30/2012 at 2:00 PM Eastern From: Nicholson, Shawn [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:13 AM To: Owens, Trevor Subject: NDSA: Qs for Archivematica Dear Trevor, I'm not certain if my September 27 post to the list serv ever actually appeared. I've appended it so that you may send to the list if necessary. Regards, Shawn Disappointingly, I will not be able to attend the October ConCall with Peter VG. As I indicated I do have a few Qs to offer for your consideration, please see appended. Regards, shawn . Will version 1.0 be another feature release, or will it signify a beta commitment? What does your answer mean for developers building tools to work with Archivematica? . What are 2 or 3 things that need to happen to broaden interoperability with major preservation softwares (e.g. FedoraCommons, ContentDM, Digital Commons)? . What can you say about the rumored "workflow customization gui"? Are there implications for institution-specific workflows and policies? . What performance tests does the Archivematica team run? Can you share anything about the specific metrics or performance goals? ############################ To unsubscribe from the NDSA-INFRASTRUCTURE list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/scripts/wa-DIGITAL.exe?SUBED1=NDSA-INFRASTRUCTURE&A=1 ############################ To unsubscribe from the NDSA-INFRASTRUCTURE list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/scripts/wa-DIGITAL.exe?SUBED1=NDSA-INFRASTRUCTURE&A=1