That would really dumb down the metadata. DC is very limited. Nate --------------------------------------------------------------- Nate Trail --------------------------------------------------------------- Network Development and MARC Standards Office Technology Policy Mail stop 4402 Library Services Library of Congress 202-707-2193 [log in to unmask] -----Original Message----- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of john passmore Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 10:28 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] PBCore 2.0 to MARC XML? Ah, that makes sense. I could try PBCore>Dublin Core>MARC 21. On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Tom Keays <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > PBCore lists a bunch of crosswalk mapping schemes that they've identified. > > http://www.pbcore.org/PBCore/PBCore_Mappings.html > > Some of them are listed but aren't done yet, including a direct > mapping to MARC 21. However, a mapping of PBCore to Dublin Core > exists, so you could probably get there by using DC as an intermediate. > > http://www.pbcore.org/PBCore/mappings/PBCore-DublinCore_Mapping.html > > They also identify the Metadata Advisory Group of the MIT Libraries as > a source of mapping information, so you could possibly consult them > for help in this project. > > http://libraries.mit.edu/guides/subjects/metadata/mappings.html > > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:15 PM, john passmore <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > Before I start reinventing the wheel, does anyone know of any > > stylesheets out there that convert PBCore 2.0 XML > > <http://pbcore.org> to MARC XML<http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/>? > > > > Thanks! > > John > > WNYC Archives > > >