How about mapping PBCore to the CIDOC-CRM as a hub format then going into MARC? http://www.cidoc-crm.org/crm_mappings.html - I don't see a PBCore mapping yet, but it should be doable. You may have to use the FRBRoo extension (http://www.cidoc-crm.org/frbr_inro.html) for some fields. The beauty of doing it that way would be that your intermediate data would also have a longer term usability if you convert to another schema later on. Or if your institution is really generous, get them to fund a mapping of PBCore and (the relevant bits of) MARC21 to the VMF: http://www.doi.org/VMF/registering.html and put it out there for everyone (including any DOI registrations) to link to? Cheers, Michael -----Original Message----- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of john passmore Sent: 06 November 2012 15:28 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] PBCore 2.0 to MARC XML? Ah, that makes sense. I could try PBCore>Dublin Core>MARC 21. On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Tom Keays <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > PBCore lists a bunch of crosswalk mapping schemes that they've identified. > > http://www.pbcore.org/PBCore/PBCore_Mappings.html > > Some of them are listed but aren't done yet, including a direct > mapping to MARC 21. However, a mapping of PBCore to Dublin Core > exists, so you could probably get there by using DC as an intermediate. > > http://www.pbcore.org/PBCore/mappings/PBCore-DublinCore_Mapping.html > > They also identify the Metadata Advisory Group of the MIT Libraries as > a source of mapping information, so you could possibly consult them > for help in this project. > > http://libraries.mit.edu/guides/subjects/metadata/mappings.html > > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:15 PM, john passmore <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > Before I start reinventing the wheel, does anyone know of any > > stylesheets out there that convert PBCore 2.0 XML > > <http://pbcore.org> to MARC XML<http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/>? > > > > Thanks! > > John > > WNYC Archives > > >