 |
 |
I've submitted the request to add my post to the CoC github at https://github.com/code4lib/antiharassment-policy/issues/25. I have a couple of other thoughts roaming around my head atm, and might post a couple of additions/tweaks to what I wrote in the issue thread. Also, sorry for the typos in the last post. I wrote the post at 6 am before consuming tea. Lastly, to end your day... Puppies: http://animal.discovery.com/tv-shows/puppy-bowl/games-and-more/puppy-cam.htm and Kittens: http://animal.discovery.com/tv-shows/too-cute/games-more/kitten-cam.htm Thanks, Becky On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Ranti Junus <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > +1 to the proposed approach. Thank you, Becky. > > > ranti. > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Mark A. Matienzo > <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Becky Yoose <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >> > So that's my answer. In Real Life people will have opinions about how >> > the CoC is enforced. People will argue that a particular decision was >> > unfair, and others will say that it didn't go far enough. We really >> > can't stop people having opinions, but what we could do here is have >> > constructive discussions that lead to something tangible (affirmation >> > of decision, change in CoC, modify decision, etc,), instead of >> > reproducing the comments section of a story on a news site. >> > >> > I can add this as a new issue to the CoC Github, as supporting >> > documentation to the code later today. >> >> becky++ >> >> I like the proposed approach. >> >> -mark >> > > > > -- > Bulk mail. Postage paid.