 |
 |
Any policy that could result in people being removed or banned for failing to comply warrants a group decision. Unless anyone presumes to speak for the group, online voting is the only tool we have to make it official. I understand it's new territory, but does anyone have a problem with it? On 1/24/13 10:01 AM, Mark A. Matienzo wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Jonathan Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> Any group decision in the past has been done via diebold-o-tron. >> >> No, this is not true, that "any" group decision has been done via online vote. Or it's true only in the sense that one only considers it a 'group decision' if it was done by online vote. >> >> [..snip..] >> >> To my knowledge, no other decision about code4lib has ever been made by online vote. > > More to the point, no other decision about code4lib in terms of > "action" or "policy" has been made ever. This is new territory for us. > > Mark > -- Shaun Ellis User Interace Developer, Digital Initiatives Princeton University Library