 |
 |
I don't see any reason to not list repos that contain library code. I wasn't really aiming for the Wikipedia style canonical listing, so the more links the better. Pat On Saturday, February 16, 2013, Jason Ronallo wrote: > Pat, > > While my library has an institutional account we currently use for > private repos, we have released some code which is maintained under > individual accounts. The code in the individual repositories is > copyright North Carolina State University, but isn't included under > the institutional account. It might be that in the future we release > some code through the institutional account, but have not yet. > > There are good reasons why this might be the case for other > institutions as well. For instance an institution could allow code to > be released but not want to take on responsibility for maintaining it. > > While our library is sharing some code through individuals and their > accounts, I wonder if listing individual accounts like this is out of > scope for the page you've created? Would it be worth it to create a > page that lists individual accounts of code4libbers? Are there other > ways to find code released by code4lib folks? > > Jason > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Patrick Berry <[log in to unmask]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > First, to the organizations doing this, thank you so much for sharing. > I'm > > sure I'm not the only person to notice the growth in code sharing, > > especially through Github. > > > > As we're associated with libraries, I thought it might be good to have a > > list, no matter how incomplete, of libraries sharing code. As you might > > imagine Google searches for library or libraries tend be full of code > > libraries instead of Libraries with code. Go figure... > > > > http://wiki.code4lib.org/index.php/Libraries_Sharing_Code > > > > As with all wiki pages, please do add what isn't there. Unless it's > links > > to cheap prescription pills or something. Don't do that. > > > > I will admit that originally this page was titled "Libraries with Github > > Organizations" but I quickly realized that the first response would point > > out the painfully obvious fact that you can share code without Github. > > Yes, I was aware of that before I started the page but I'll @blame > jetlag > > and CST. > > > > Pat (the one from Chico) >