 |
 |
TDB as per the startup instruction: "fuseki-server --loc=DB /DatasetPathName" Ethan On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Feb 20, 2013, at 2:52 PM, Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > Hi Hugh, > > > > I have investigated the possibility of deploying Fuseki as a war in > Tomcat ( > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-201) because I wasn't sure > how > > the default Jetty container would respond in production, but since you > > aren't having any problems with that deployment, I may go ahead and do > that. > > Fuseki/Jetty will have no problems scaling, it's what the Talis Platform > used for large datasets. I also ran a large dataset for quite a while with > it. > > Which backend are you using? TDB? SDB? > > -Ross. > > > > > Ethan > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Hugh Cayless <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > > >> Hi Ethan! > >> > >> We've been using Jena/Fuseki in papyri.info for about a year now, iirc. > >> We started with Mulgara, but switched. It's running in its own Jetty > >> container in our system, but I've had no performance issues with it > >> whatever. > >> > >> Best, > >> Hugh > >> > >> On Feb 20, 2013, at 14:31 , Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I have been playing around with Fuseki ( > >>> http://jena.apache.org/documentation/serving_data/index.html) for a > few > >>> months to get my feet wet with accessing and querying RDF. I quite > like > >>> it. I find it well documented and easy to set up. We will soon deploy > a > >>> SPARQL server in a production environment, and I would like to know if > >>> others on the list have experience with Fuseki in production, or have > >> other > >>> recommendations. Mulgara is off the table as it inexplicably conflicts > >>> with other apps installed in Tomcat. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Ethan > >> >