 |
 |
Thanks everyone for the info. This soothed my apprehensions of running Fuseki in a production environment. Ethan On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I'll add that the LARQ plugin for Fuseki (which adds Lucene indexes) is > pretty awesome, as well. > > -Ross. > > On Feb 20, 2013, at 3:57 PM, John Fereira <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > If forgot about that. That issue was created quite awhile ago and I > hadn't check on it in a long time. I've found that Jetty has worked fine > in our production environment so far. As I wrote earlier, I have it > connecting to a jena SDB that is used for a semantic web application (VIVO) > that was developed here. Although we have the semantic web application > running on a different server than the SDB database I found the performance > was fairly significantly improved by having the Fuseki server running on > the same machine as the SDB. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > Ethan Gruber > > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:52 PM > > To: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Fuseki and other SPARQL servers > > > > Hi Hugh, > > > > I have investigated the possibility of deploying Fuseki as a war in > Tomcat ( > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-201) because I wasn't sure > how the default Jetty container would respond in production, but since you > aren't having any problems with that deployment, I may go ahead and do that. > > > > Ethan > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Hugh Cayless <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > > >> Hi Ethan! > >> > >> We've been using Jena/Fuseki in papyri.info for about a year now, iirc. > >> We started with Mulgara, but switched. It's running in its own Jetty > >> container in our system, but I've had no performance issues with it > >> whatever. > >> > >> Best, > >> Hugh > >> > >> On Feb 20, 2013, at 14:31 , Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I have been playing around with Fuseki ( > >>> http://jena.apache.org/documentation/serving_data/index.html) for a > >>> few months to get my feet wet with accessing and querying RDF. I > >>> quite like it. I find it well documented and easy to set up. We > >>> will soon deploy a SPARQL server in a production environment, and I > >>> would like to know if others on the list have experience with Fuseki > >>> in production, or have > >> other > >>> recommendations. Mulgara is off the table as it inexplicably > >>> conflicts with other apps installed in Tomcat. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Ethan > >> >