 |
 |
On Feb 20, 2013, at 2:52 PM, Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi Hugh, > > I have investigated the possibility of deploying Fuseki as a war in Tomcat ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-201) because I wasn't sure how > the default Jetty container would respond in production, but since you > aren't having any problems with that deployment, I may go ahead and do that. Fuseki/Jetty will have no problems scaling, it's what the Talis Platform used for large datasets. I also ran a large dataset for quite a while with it. Which backend are you using? TDB? SDB? -Ross. > > Ethan > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Hugh Cayless <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Hi Ethan! >> >> We've been using Jena/Fuseki in papyri.info for about a year now, iirc. >> We started with Mulgara, but switched. It's running in its own Jetty >> container in our system, but I've had no performance issues with it >> whatever. >> >> Best, >> Hugh >> >> On Feb 20, 2013, at 14:31 , Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have been playing around with Fuseki ( >>> http://jena.apache.org/documentation/serving_data/index.html) for a few >>> months to get my feet wet with accessing and querying RDF. I quite like >>> it. I find it well documented and easy to set up. We will soon deploy a >>> SPARQL server in a production environment, and I would like to know if >>> others on the list have experience with Fuseki in production, or have >> other >>> recommendations. Mulgara is off the table as it inexplicably conflicts >>> with other apps installed in Tomcat. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ethan >>