 |
 |
I'll add that the LARQ plugin for Fuseki (which adds Lucene indexes) is pretty awesome, as well. -Ross. On Feb 20, 2013, at 3:57 PM, John Fereira <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > If forgot about that. That issue was created quite awhile ago and I hadn't check on it in a long time. I've found that Jetty has worked fine in our production environment so far. As I wrote earlier, I have it connecting to a jena SDB that is used for a semantic web application (VIVO) that was developed here. Although we have the semantic web application running on a different server than the SDB database I found the performance was fairly significantly improved by having the Fuseki server running on the same machine as the SDB. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ethan Gruber > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:52 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Fuseki and other SPARQL servers > > Hi Hugh, > > I have investigated the possibility of deploying Fuseki as a war in Tomcat ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-201) because I wasn't sure how the default Jetty container would respond in production, but since you aren't having any problems with that deployment, I may go ahead and do that. > > Ethan > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Hugh Cayless <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Hi Ethan! >> >> We've been using Jena/Fuseki in papyri.info for about a year now, iirc. >> We started with Mulgara, but switched. It's running in its own Jetty >> container in our system, but I've had no performance issues with it >> whatever. >> >> Best, >> Hugh >> >> On Feb 20, 2013, at 14:31 , Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have been playing around with Fuseki ( >>> http://jena.apache.org/documentation/serving_data/index.html) for a >>> few months to get my feet wet with accessing and querying RDF. I >>> quite like it. I find it well documented and easy to set up. We >>> will soon deploy a SPARQL server in a production environment, and I >>> would like to know if others on the list have experience with Fuseki >>> in production, or have >> other >>> recommendations. Mulgara is off the table as it inexplicably >>> conflicts with other apps installed in Tomcat. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ethan >>