 |
 |
This is good info. I guess I will build out a test Drupal integration, unless I can talk someone else into doing it. Cary On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Tom Johnson < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > I would add that it generally does better for "realtime" applications. If > your index is updated often, ES *might* perform much better than Solr. > > http://blog.socialcast.com/realtime-search-solr-vs-elasticsearch/ > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > > So the main advantages to ES over Solr that I can think of offhand are > the > > fact that you can store and search on complex JSON documents (that is, > > documents with nested objects, etc.) making it an effective standalone > > document database and the fact that it will automatically replicate and > > shard to other instances using zeroconf. > > > > -Ross. > > > > On Mar 14, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Cary Gordon <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > > > I am trying to decide whether we should evaluate it and possibly do a > > > Drupal integration. > > > > > > I know that this is not a trivial question, but, being lazy, I would > like > > > to know in what ways it provides services that I can't get from Solr. I > > > have looked at the comparo cheatsheet — > http://solr-vs-elasticsearch.com > > > > > > Cary > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:59 AM, MJ Suhonos <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > > > >> Likewise, I've been using it since mid-2010 (0.6.0). What do you want > > to > > >> know about it? > > >> > > >> MJ > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Cary Gordon > > > The Cherry Hill Company > > > http://chillco.com > > > -- Cary Gordon The Cherry Hill Company http://chillco.com