 |
 |
Hi, On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Matt Jones <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Have you considered putting up a Q&A site outside of the SE network, where > you can control the set of policies employed better? Indeed, that suggestion has been made, implicitly or explicitly, by several participants in this thread, and I think that hosting our own instance of OSQA (or the like) is probably necessary to get the cultural fit right. Assuming that there's enough interest such that somebody feels inspired to set one up and host it, under the C4L aegis or not, one question I have is whether it is better off being comprehensive (e.g., all the libraries, all the archives, all the musuems, etc.) to have as large a pool as possible, or whether having a bunch of more focused fora (e.g., the potential digital preservation one mentioned by Trevor) is the way to go. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton Manager of Implementation Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts email: [log in to unmask] direct: +1 770-709-5581 cell: +1 404-984-4366 skype: gmcharlt web: http://www.esilibrary.com/ Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org & http://evergreen-ils.org