 |
 |
Thanks, Roy (and others!) It looks like the 245 is including the $c - dang! I should have been more specific. I'm mainly interested in the title, which is $a $b -- I'm looking at the gains and losses of bytes should one implement FRBR. As a hedge, could I ask what've you got for the 240? that may be closer to reality. kc On 10/16/13 10:57 AM, Roy Tennant wrote: > I don't even have to fire it up. That's a statistic that we generate > quarterly (albeit via Hadoop). Here you go: > > 100 - 30.3 > 245 - 103.1 > 600 - 41 > 610 - 48.8 > 611 - 61.4 > 630 - 40.8 > 648 - 23.8 > 650 - 35.1 > 651 - 39.6 > 653 - 33.3 > 654 - 38.1 > 655 - 22.5 > 656 - 30.6 > 657 - 27.4 > 658 - 30.7 > 662 - 41.7 > > Roy > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Sean Hannan <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> That sounds like a request for Roy to fire up the ole OCLC Hadoop. >> >> -Sean >> >> >> >> On 10/16/13 1:06 PM, "Karen Coyle" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> Anybody have data for the average length of specific MARC fields in some >>> reasonably representative database? I mainly need 100, 245, 6xx. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> kc >>> >>> -- >>> Karen Coyle >>> [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net >>> m: 1-510-435-8234 >>> skype: kcoylenet -- Karen Coyle [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet