 |
 |
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Jon Phipps <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask] > >wrote: > > > > All in my opinion, and all debatable. I hope that your choice goes well > > > for > > > > you, > > > > > > I'd like to repeat: just because I agree with that choice, and I'm > > > defending it here, it wasn't my choice. Not at all. And the concerns > you > > > express were well-aired and very carefully considered before the choice > > was > > > made. > > > > And yours :) > > Ok, that makes me feel a bit personally defensive... > Apologies! It was too much shorthand. I meant that your concerns were well-aired, and well explained, in this thread :) Rob