" xx""DQ : wools x On Jan 25, 2014 4:20 PM, "Robert Sanderson" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Jon Phipps <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask] > > >wrote: > > > > > > All in my opinion, and all debatable. I hope that your choice goes > well > > > > for > > > > > you, > > > > > > > > I'd like to repeat: just because I agree with that choice, and I'm > > > > defending it here, it wasn't my choice. Not at all. And the concerns > > you > > > > express were well-aired and very carefully considered before the > choice > > > was > > > > made. > > > > > > And yours :) > > > > Ok, that makes me feel a bit personally defensive... > > > > > Apologies! It was too much shorthand. I meant that your concerns were > well-aired, and well explained, in this thread :) > > Rob >